lunes, 7 de agosto de 2017

It's that time of year!

August is back!

In my personal life, I've had a very busy summer that while fulfilling, was also totally draining.  For the first time in a long time, I'm headed back to school running on fumes. And I'm still committed to making changes--silly me.

Our first day back with students is August 23, and I've decided that I want to introduce TRPS (Total Physical Response Storytelling, trademarked and popularized by Blaine Ray) as my main method of instruction in at least one of my courses. I teach exploratory Spanish in grades 5 and 6, Spanish I in grades 7 and 8, an English research elective in grades 7 and 8, and ESL at all grades, so changing/adding/modifying anything tends to create a chain reaction of change that has the potential to get a little out of hand when I'm working with as many as six preps, multiple developmental stages and at least 3 languages a day, and popping in and out of four different buildings in the course of a week. I love all of the things I do, but it can get overwhelming from time to time.

So researching and developing a new curriculum from scratch in August on fumes is frustrating. But the more I read and think about TPRS, the more I'm convinced that it's the right direction to take all my language teaching - grades 5 through 8 Spanish, ESL K-12, everything. I'm going into my 9th year of teaching (WHEN did that happen??), and I cannot believe that I'm just now hearing about TPRS, just now getting more exposure to it and information about it.

The absolute basics of TPRS (and practicing teachers, correct me where I'm wrong!): 
1. Establish meaning.  The teacher determines a set of structures/vocab that students will need to learn in order to understand the story she is going to use.  Pretty much everything I've read insists there should be no more than THREE new structures in a story--this is because students have to understand and get comfortable with these structures to the point of automaticity, and three is about all they can handle at a time. So the teacher writes the new structures on the board, translates them into English, and establishes a gesture that the entire class will use any time these new structures pop up in the TPRS process.  She uses them in a statement, an affirmative question, a negative question, and an either/or question. There's lots of other stuff that can happen here, but that's the gist of Step One.

2. Ask questions. The teacher starts asking questions about the story (which students haven't read yet). Students should guess the answer, and all answers should be in the target language. (E.g., Is there a boy? Yes, there's a boy. Is there a girl? No, there's a boy). Alternatively, the teacher can make a statement about the story and then ask the class about the statement: There is a boy. Is there a boy? Yes, there is a boy. The point is that everything in TPRS is highly interactive, mostly in the target language, interesting, and engaging. The teacher should repeat the information in lots of different ways, predictably, until every student understands the basic facts of the story - she should use statements, then affirmative questions, negative questions, either/or questions, and open-ended questions.  The Q&A bit here is referred to in TPRS as "circling," since the teacher hovers over the same piece of information and asks about it in lots of different ways.

3. Reading.  The teacher will read one line at a time in the target language, then the class translates each individual line into English to ensure comprehension. This should also help them tie all that new information together. The most practice kids get, the less translation they'll need in the long run, but translation is a good way to begin a lower-level class. After choral reading/translation, the teacher can have students act out the story as she narrates, and she can pause to ask the actors questions (thereby introducing and practicing 2nd person forms).

There's lots and lots and LOTS of other details, possible activities, lesson tangents, and deeper learning opportunities, but that's the most basic outline I can offer. Here's why I'm forcing myself to make the change to TPRS, even though it would be much easier to just keep doing what I've done before:
 - I am pretty good at teaching reading and writing, since those are my personal strengths.  I am pretty terrible at teaching speaking and listening, though, and TPRS is heavy on both of those skills.
 - Despite speaking and listening being my weaker language skills, TPRS feels extremely accessible and doable to me. I feel confident that I can make this happen, and that it will immediately benefit my students.
 - My incoming group of 6th graders has a penchant for presentations and play-acting; this will play well to acting out stories, writing their own parallel stories, and contributing creative and interesting answers.
 - Everything in this method is customizable to individual learners. While I can use a set of mini-stories to guide the structures I introduce and the cultural concepts I want students to learn, they fill in the blanks with what they need and find interesting. I can ensure that they have the structures they need to communicate while they decide what to communicate.
 - From what I can tell, TPRS is suitable for the absolute beginner as well as more advanced students, and I love that it spirals learning - taking previous structures and using them in new ways, or adding depth to them. Spiraling has long been my most difficult challenge, especially when it comes to individual students. I know there is no magic trick that instantly levels content for all kids, but TPRS looks very promising.


So - here's my first attempt at writing my own TPRS story for 6th grade exploratory Spanish.  I plan to introduce TPRS after several lessons of the basics (name, origin, age, how are you, etc.) so there is some background knowledge for kids to work with. I make my own workbooks, so I've set up the mini story as a couple of pages that kids can go back and reference when they need to. I know I'm using more vocab/structures than is recommended, but I think I need to actually go through this lesson once to figure out how to fix it, so I've left them in for now.


Cuento Uno: Juan Quiere Comer
Write what each of these phrases means, then illustrate it in a way that helps you remember it.
This is your notebook, so be sure to jot down new words, too!

Quiere
Va a
Tiene
Le gusta
Hay
Comer
Comida



Try answering these questions for yourself (in Spanish, of course!)—remember there are question words posted in the classroom and listed in the front of your workbook:
1.       ¿Qué comida te gusta comer?



2.       ¿Adónde vas para comer?



3.       ¿Qué comida hay en la cafeteria?






Juan Quiere Comer
You’ll read this as a class – one line in Spanish, then you’ll help translate the line into English. Write down anything that will help you, especially the meanings of new words.

Hay un chico.
El chico se llama Juan.
Juan es estudiante.
Juan es de Perú.
Juan quiere comer un taco.

Juan va a un restaurante.
Juan quiere comer un taco.
Le gusta mucho comer tacos.
El restaurante tiene comida de Perú.
El restaurante no tiene tacos.
El taco no es de Perú.

Juan va a México.
Juan va a un restaurante.
Juan quiere comer un taco.
¡El restaurante tiene tacos!
¡Hay muchos tacos!
El taco es de México.
Juan come muchos tacos.


Next – Act it out!


After that – add/change details, then write your own story! 





I welcome any input from teachers who have experience with TPRS - how can I avoid common mistakes? What would you do differently? 

I also welcome input from other teachers, parents, and students--what do you think about this method of language learning? What are your concerns? 


My main source for everything above:
Ray, B. & C. Seely. (2016). Fluency through TPR storytelling. 7th ed. TPRS Books: Eagle Mountain, UT.

Edited to add this great intro TPRS guide from Bryce Hedstrom:
http://www.brycehedstrom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/THE_BASICS_OF_TPRS2.pdf


viernes, 21 de abril de 2017

What the heck was I thinking: Five huge changes I made this year

Late April is a tricky time of year for teachers.  We can see the light at the end of the tunnel, but we know we still have 6-8 weeks to get there.

Hang in there, friends.

This year, late April is the time of year when I wonder what the heck I was thinking when I decided to try so many new things in the same semester. A recap:

In the fall, I decided to stop assigning homework. The pros: Less decontextualized work for students, less grading for me, grades became a more accurate reflection of students' actual abilities. Hooray! The cons: students initially felt less connected to the material, required more reassurance from me, and some failed to realize there would no longer be a homework grade to affect their overall grade, so a handful of kids dropped a letter grade that quarter.

In the middle of the fall semester, I finally cut the cords with our textbook completely.  I had been weaning myself off of it, but I finally stopped using it altogether.  I kept a class set under the desks for kids who still wanted the comfort of a book as a reference, but we no longer used it for direct instruction, a vocab/grammar source, or any kind of class activity. The pros: students had to actually listen to me to get their info, no more book assignments/lost books/damaged books, no more decontextualized grammar/drills/verb charts, student-created language lists rule, our resources are REAL and up-to-date, and there's a noticeable increase in voluntary conversation and reading. The cons: I have to start from scratch finding appropriate and relevant resources on a budget that resembles dental floss more than a shoe string, I find that I want to try EVERYTHING EVER with my students and our new-found freedom and there just isn't time, I am slowly realizing that I was much more dependent on a pre-determined curriculum than I thought, I am slowly realizing that I know virtually nothing about teaching without a textbook, and all of that occasionally makes me feel like a great big old failure. So there's that.

With the start of the spring semester in January, my classes all changed.  My Spanish I students have me for the spring semester of their seventh grade year and the fall semester of their eighth grade year (it avoids scheduling issues with other state-required classes to split it up that way), so I got two brand-new classes of seventh graders, who were brand-new to Spanish I.  I've been reading about and thinking about Standards-Based Learning for a while, and I finally decided to take the plunge and start my new Spanish I classes as entirely SBL courses.  The kids got a letter to take home explaining the differences between previous classes and this one, they got a printout of their standards, and we took off at a stumble.  The pros: AMAZING LANGUAGE PRODUCTION, self-actualization and self-agency, accountability like never before, independent learning, students asking for MORE, students using language creatively for real-world tasks, collaborating with each other, explaining things to each other, using the standards as a guide, asking questions, envisioning their personal language use outside of the classroom, and on and on and on and on! The cons: Brand-spanking-new system that I created myself with no feedback from other language teachers (#DeptOfOne, working on my Twitter networking skillz), being one of the first in my school to go full-on SBL so no other working models around, assuring students that this is the best way for them to learn, changing my teaching methods because my textbook-based experience falls far short of the demands of SBL instruction, creating instruction/learning tasks/assessments that meet the standard and are accessible to students while also reflecting authentic language tasks, balancing the five language skills (reading/writing/speaking/listening/conversation) and figuring out how to spiral them into increasingly demanding activities that challenge students just enough to interest them without overwhelming them, and on and on and on and on and on.

I figured if I was already making all these changes, I might as well make some more, right? (Seriously, what the heck was I thinking?). I decided to throw myself into honest-to-goodness real PBL (project-based learning). So my students are working in groups following a sort of Genius Hour model of investigation once a week to create activities for a Family Night in May.  We'll invite all their families to join us at school on a Friday night to celebrate what their students have accomplished and to have some fun with the Spanish language. We have students creating Twister in Spanish, number games, matching games, a kids' corner with art activities in Spanish, a stop-motion video for a viewing center, charades, a photo booth, Simon Dice (Simon Says), and one group of boys is learning to sing "Los Pollitos" and dressing up as chickens to act out the lyrics.  The week of the celebration, I'll do a cooking lesson in Spanish with the kids to make salsa for our refreshments. Students will make the schedule, the rules, the invitations, the snacks, the set-up, everything.  The pros: Getting it right has never mattered more!, the kids get a chance to show off together, parents get a chance to see their kids in academic action, they're having a ton of fun already just planning it, there's an incredible sense of ownership I've never seen before, and there'll be six boys dressed as chickens.  The cons: Planning planning planning. That's it.

The last change I can think of (I'm certain I'm missing something) is alternative seating. Our principals have been talking a lot about Kayla Delzer's classroom set-up (www.topdogteaching.com), and I liked what I saw.  I made a DonorsChoose project requesting four bean bags and four lap desks to make a start in the right direction, and it was funded! I was very cautious at first, severely limiting who used the beanbags, when, how often, how much, and finally in the past week I've moved the beanbags from the back of the room to the center of our Socratic circle, and added a small area rug.  So far, there has been little to no disagreement among student about who sits where, and the kids who choose to sit on the beanbags/floor seem to exhibit increased collaboration and attention to the topic at hand! I'm slowly making more changes to our classroom furniture and arrangements, to make the class an environment that's comfortable and inviting to everyone.  Pros: kids pay attention, collaborate, clean up without being told (so far), and seem to take pride in rearranging things for the next class that comes in.  The cons: can't think of any. I need more seating alternatives!


Also, a change-in-progress: I just started using super basic TPR so I can ease into TPRS and novels with my Spanish I kids, and I have no idea why I never did this before.  The kids love it; they see our five-minute TPR warm-up as a dance party! Why why WHY did I wait 8 years to do this?







martes, 28 de marzo de 2017

Self-Assessment Time!

I mentioned before that the state I teach in offers an online version of Linguafolio for students to self-assess their language levels and track their progress.

In the first week of the course back in January, students self-assessed using Linguafolio to get a baseline of their Spanish skills. Yesterday was the last day of the quarter, so the 7th grade Spanish I class strolled over to the computer lab to re-assess after having had nine weeks of instruction and practice.

Our goal for this quarter was for all students to achieve Novice Mid across the five language skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening, and conversation).  Most students on their initial self-assessment in January scored below a Novice Low (the lowest proficiency level).  73% of students scored Novice Low in one or two areas; only 10% of students scored a Novice Mid in any area on that initial assessment.

Based on the data collected yesterday, 79% of students scored Novice Mid or higher on all five language skills. The remaining 21% scored just one level below goal on only one skill. This tells me that the goal we set was reasonable, and it shows enormous growth.

I don't consider Linguafolio to be the ultimate measurement of students' skills; after all, it is a self-assessment, and there is a certain degree of subjectivity that enters into a group of 7th graders deciding what they're able to do or not.

So I also looked at the data from our class grading system, in which I assessed students based on their ability to perform to the standard. We use this 6-10 scale:

Grades in Spanish Class
And how to move forward
10       I meet or exceed the standard!
I’m ready to move on to the next level in this skill! I should look at my standards packet to see where to go next.
9          I almost meet the standard.
I’m really, really close! I just need to make an extra push and I’ll be there!
8          I’m struggling with this standard.
I need to ask Srta. Elliott to meet with me during class or homebase to explain it again and practice.  I may need to practice on my own at home with materials from Srta. Elliott, which she is happy to offer me.
7          I can’t do this standard yet at all.
This is so frustrating! I need extra help from Srta. Elliott outside of class, and I need to practice on my own with the materials I ask her for.
I WILL ask for help!
6          This assignment/assessment is missing.

I didn’t turn this in and I need to get it in NOW!


I assess each of the five skills individually, then average the scores to get a student's final grade. Using this system, 71% of students earned As (i.e., they meet or exceed the standard), 21% earned Bs (i.e., they very nearly met the standard but were missing something small that held them back from demonstrating complete ability), and 7% earned Cs (i.e., they still struggle with the standard).  For the most part, this lines up with their self-assessed levels, though there is some slight disparity here and there.  I plan to conduct individual conferences with students in which we look at their self-assessed scores and their teacher-assessed scores to determine their strengths and their needs.

In the meantime, I have some possible explanations for the disparity.

1.) The self-assessed scores are higher than the teacher-assessed scores. This may be due to students over-estimating their own abilities in the language, which is par for the course.  It's easy to think, "Oh, I can do that" until you actually have to do the thing. To try to combat this, I tell students not to check off a skill unless they can think of a specific time that they performed that skill in Spanish.  This has been helpful, but students may still be over-estimating themselves in the language.  It happens.

2.) Students had the opportunity to practice their weak skills and re-assess with me.  None of those C-earning students took advantage of that opportunity on any of their five skills.  I feel confident that had they tried, all of them would have improved at least one of their skill scores, and therefore their overall score. This is something that we will discuss this week, as those students may not have thought the effort would be worth their time.

In a group of 38 students, the C-earners account for only three students.  This, to me, is remarkable. This clearly points out which students need more of my attention and help, and which skills they need the most help with.  I can pinpoint exactly how to help those three students and concentrate my efforts to achieve the greatest possible outcome for them.  I will, of course, be helping the rest of the group, too--just because they scored As and Bs doesn't mean they're done with me! But I can use the data I've collected to zero in on which students need help with which skills the most, and as it's based on skill standards, the data is quite reliable and actionable.





jueves, 23 de marzo de 2017

SBL FTW! How I started SBL in a language classroom

What SBL Is
SBL is Standards-Based Learning. Every state has set standards for subjects, usually according to grade level. They're what we expect students to be able to do by the end of that grade level, and they're supposed to be the basis of all instruction and assessment, to ensure that all students have access to a consistent, high-quality, grade-level-appropriate education.  Sometimes, though, the focus of instruction gets lost in the ever-increasing pile of paperwork, red tape, new mandates/methods/programs/tech, student issues, and general melange of hoops every teacher has to jump through every day just to get through a work day.

 In a school that uses standards-based approaches to educating students, learning standards—i.e., concise, written descriptions of what students are expected to know and be able to do at a specific stage of their education—determine the goals of a lesson or course, and teachers then determine how and what to teach students so they achieve the learning expectations described in the standards (http://edglossary.org/standards-based/).

For my first few years of teaching, I knew there were standards, and I looked at them sometimes, but they didn't shape my instruction. I was one of those teachers who thought, "I have a textbook! I'm following the textbook, so I'm doing everything I'm supposed to do." I was guilty as anyone when it came to assuming that a textbook will "cover" everything I was supposed to "cover." I use quotes here, because I'm not here to "cover" information; I'm here to teach kids skills.  There's a difference.  And textbooks are really great at "covering" information, but they are typically not conducive to teaching skills. Even textbooks that have been approved by a state school board, the local school board, and that look great to the classroom teacher are not necessarily based on the grade-level standards that we're supposed to be teaching. Textbooks often don't address standards in a progression that makes sense to students, and they certainly cannot adapt to students' needs.  There are good textbooks out there, but relying on a textbook as the sole source of curriculum is foolhardy and a complete disservice to our students.

Instead, the teacher should decide which standards to address, in what order, and to what degree. The teacher may need additional materials, or additional resources.  She may abandon the textbook altogether!

This takes time. It takes effort. It takes planning. It pays off.


How I Started SBL
I attended a wonderful conference for foreign language teachers in my state (https://wvflta.wordpress.com/) in 2014. It was my fifth year teaching and my first time ever attending a conference specific to my subject area--I wish I had gone much, much sooner.  I met all kinds of language teachers who knew WAY more than I did, and they all talked about communication and proficiency. I was way out of my league.  I had been taught Spanish through some very traditional methods that most people my age and older are familiar with: here's a verb, here's how you conjugate it, now go conjugate this verb until you puke.

But that's not how people acquire a new language. That's ultimately not how I acquired Spanish. I acquired Spanish by living in Spanish-speaking countries.  Sure, I could tell you the pluperfect subjunctive form of any verb you gave me, but I could barely tell a doctor that I had a sinus infection, which suddenly seemed like a much more useful skill than obscure verb conjugation. I realized that I needed to change what I was doing if I wanted my students to be able to actually use the language they were learning.

Change was (and still is) difficult, though, as I had only ever had traditional instruction as my example.  I read articles, I watched YouTube videos, I reviewed my notes from the conference, and I slowly started trying new things.  I made a professional Twitter account (@ogmsespanol) and began networking with other language teachers with similar instructional goals. I started using more Spanish in my instruction, I started giving control of the class to my students, I got rid of the textbook, and I stopped giving homework. And just this semester, two and a half years after I first saw information about SBL in a language classroom, I went full SBL myself. I'm still figuring it out, and I'm still making mistakes, and I probably always will, but I'm learning from them all the time.

How ANYONE Can Do SBL
I've posted previously about how any teacher in any subject area can implement standards-based learning.  That post is here: How Anyone Can Do SBL

For Language Teachers: How I Do SBL in a Language Class
First, a disclaimer: I do not know all about this. I am not an expert. I have a lot of theoretical background including an MA in Applied Linguistics, but I was taught to teach using the Grammar Translation method, and so in communicative practice I am a total novice. I'm learning as I go, and I am grateful for all suggestions that come my way. Please do not hesitate to add your own experience and correct my mistakes.

I use the ACTFL Can Do Statements to design my instruction, practice, and assessment. Linguafolio is an assessment tool that uses the ACTFL Can Do Statements to help students self-assess their language proficiency level. My state provides Linguafolio in an online format, but if you don't have access to the online version, you can use the paper format to have your students self-assess before you begin a language course.

I teach a nine-week exploratory course to grades 5 and 6. The class meets every day for 45 minutes.  I have not yet made these courses completely SBL, but I'm working on it one piece at a time. By the end of the nine weeks, my goal is for students to be at the Novice Mid proficiency level. This may be a little ambitious, but I believe with focused materials, instruction, and practice that this is possible for all students.

I also teach Spanish I to grades seven and eight. This course is the spring semester of the 7th grade year and the fall semester of the 8th grade year.  This is the course that I have made entirely SBL, starting at the beginning of the course in January 2017.

Our goal for the first quarter is for all students to demonstrate Novice Mid proficiency in all five language skills: presentational speaking, presentational writing, interpretive reading, interpretive listening, and interpersonal communication. In the first week of class, I gave all students their own copy of the ACTFL Can Do statements, and we read the Novice Low standards together out loud, then the Novice Mid.  I talked about what it means to be proficient at a particular level, and what I envisioned us doing to get there.  After familiarizing themselves with the standards, students spent a class period self-assessing their language proficiency using Linguafolio to establish a baseline. It's important that students understand the language of the standards, as I've had students in the past use Linguafolio and severely overestimate their abilities because they did not fully understand what the standard required. Now, I require students to write down a specific time/activity when they used the skill in the standard, and I find that students' self-assessment is much more accurate.

Throughout the course, students can informally self-assess as they need to in order to check their own progress.  I strongly encourage this, and from time to time we informally self-assess as a class to see where we need to go next (i.e., what instruction/activities I should prepare for them or guide them in to). When we begin a new set of standards, I have students help me brainstorm activities that will help them achieve the standard, and once we've selected an activity together, I sit down with the class and we create our own vocabulary/grammar needs list.  Over the course of the next few days, I offer a mini-lesson for direct instruction, then have students practice the activity they selected.

Assessment happens after a few weeks, when students have had the chance to read the standard, get instruction, practice the skill, and prep for assessment.  Assessments are as authentic as possible, and we only assess one language skill at a time.  This allows me to offer specific, written, actionable feedback to each student on each of their five skills.  I use the ten-point grade scale below.  My goal is to be as objective as possible, while providing students with specific steps for what to do next. The lowest possible score is a 6, or a 60%, which is a whole topic unto itself - essentially, if a student totally misses an assignment, they only have to dig themselves out of a 60%, rather than a 0%.  It's much fairer than the traditional 0-100% scale. I post this scale all over the classroom and in the hallway, and students will include a copy of it in the interactive notebooks we're starting in the coming weeks.



Grades in Spanish Class
And how to move forward
10       I meet or exceed the standard!
I’m ready to move on to the next level in this skill! I should look at my standards packet to     
see where to go next.
9          I almost meet the standard.
I’m really, really close! I just need to make an extra push and I’ll be there!
8          I’m struggling with this standard.
I need to ask Srta. Elliott to meet with me during class or homebase to explain it again and practice.  I may need to practice on my own at home with materials from Srta. Elliott, which she is happy to offer me.
7          I can’t do this standard yet at all.
This is so frustrating! I need extra help from Srta. Elliott outside of class, and I need to practice on my own with the materials I ask her for.
6          This assignment/assessment is missing.
I didn’t turn this in and I need to get it in NOW!


Deadlines are set by students, and they are flexible (within reason). Once students know what is expected of them, I ask them to establish a timeline and set their deadline together.  If a student needs an extra day or two, they make arrangements with me to have their own deadline.  If a student is done early and wants to turn in their work early, they can, and then I direct them to the next standard/activity/proficiency level. This helps personalize learning, keeps students moving on the trajectory they've set, and helps students develop those metacognitive/executive functions that we all want them to have but often have trouble teaching them.


Positive Payouts with SBL
I was confident that going full SBL would have positive results, but I was not prepared for how quickly I would see them.  My students spent a few weeks adjusting and realizing that they were expected to actually communicate in Spanish, not simply memorize words and regurgitate them on a worksheet.  They still sometimes forget that their purpose in class is to work toward the standard rather than a percentage grade (there's more about our difficulties and challenges below).

In nine weeks (one quarter), my 7th grade students have made incredible progress in the language and in their self-agency. The only grades are assessments of their five language skills, and they have come to realize that while an activity may not be graded, doing it will help them do well on the assessment. Most students have taken work home to take more time on it. Several students have asked for ways to practice on their own (and their parents have too!). The students know their standards, and since I've been sending out a family newsletter and uploaded our standards document to our online grading system, their families know them, too. I've had several positive interactions with families about our new learning style, including one mom who thanked me for posting our standards!

Now that students know the standards and how they're being evaluated, classroom engagement is at an all-time high.  I don't have to threaten homework or extended assignments; all I have to do is remind students that this is one of many baby steps that will get them to their evaluation. One small, reasonable, quiet reminder, and the entire class is back on track. Yes, there are occasional days that are chaos. This is middle school, after all.  But there is no constant struggle, no threatening, no negotiating, no seating chart--simply tune in and understand, or expect to struggle.  No one likes to struggle.

Toward the end of the grading period, I offer students the opportunity to make appointments to re-evaluate one or more language skills during our homeroom period. I will not hunt them down; they must make the appointment themselves and remember to show up. They must use the feedback I have given them, re-read the standard, and practice before they can re-evaluate--it's a lot of work.  Out of 36 7th grade students, 15 made and kept appointments to re-evaluate at least one skill. When was the last time 41% of a class of 7th graders showed that kind of self-agency in their education? I've never seen it.

There is still some misunderstanding, of course--SBL isn't a magic solution. But in nine weeks, my Spanish I students are able to talk about themselves, their daily activities, their likes and dislikes, describe others and their likes and dislikes, and most of them chose to talk about their families, so they know how to describe their family members, too. They've started a unit on story telling in which they use common verbs to talk about pictures, so they've started using simple sentences and they can recognize questions and ask/answer simple questions about what they see. This is a big deal. At this same point in the semester using the textbook, my students in the past were only able to tell their likes/dislikes and describe themselves. It's not because this group is smarter than past classes (they are incredible, wonderful kids), but it's because I made changes that have a huge, positive impact on the way my students learn.


Current Issues with SBL
It all sounds idyllic, but there are issues, too. Students are used to more traditional methods of "doing school," and this style of SBL feels very weird and uncomfortable at first. It was difficult getting students to understand that there would be no homework, no weekly assignments, no participation points, but that their job was to be mentally present to make connections and absorb everything they can.

An issue that still surfaces is students' obsession with perfect grammar.  They can't seem to understand that I don't expect perfection; in fact, I expect certain patterns of mistakes.  I had a student re-evaluate her writing standard on a poster, and rather than add the information I told her she was missing, she spent her entire time fixing grammar that didn't even keep her from communicating her point! We talked, she seemed to understand, and we're moving forward.  This is a habit we must break, though, as there can be no such thing as perfection, especially not when learning a second language.  Learning grammar is not the same as learning to communicate.

Another issue that comes up frequently is "this isn't how we've done this in the past." No, this isn't how school has been done for years; it's better.  It's focused, it's consistent, and it adapts to every student's individual needs while teaching them responsibility and instilling ownership of their education. Past practice worked for some students, but not for all students.  It's our responsibility and privilege to serve every student in our classroom, and standards-based learning is the best approach I've seen yet to reach every single child.

All of this, by the way, has been a lot of work behind the scenes. When my students walk in, they think they're playing games or chatting with their friends in Spanish for 45 minutes, but what's really happening is that I've spent days crafting activities that are just right for their current language level, while slowly pushing them to do more in small increments. This has to be just the right balance of familiar language with new challenges; too much familiar language becomes boring, while too many new challenges feels impossible and they balk. Setting up my parent newsletter, grading system, evaluation and re-evaluation policy, and keeping appointments with students is a lot of work. Creating materials, finding authentic sources, and keeping my head above water while using best practices is a lot of work. I go home every day with a headache. But look at the payouts in the section above! I've already seen so many incredible results of all of these changes that I know, after only nine weeks, I can't go back to what I did before.  I just can't.

How ANYONE Can Start SBL Instruction

      I began this list to help a colleague who was interested in beginning Standards-Based instruction, but didn't know where to begin.  These are, in my opinion, the most fundamental steps to implementing SBL.  The first few steps are the most important, but after that, phase things in gradually, as you are comfortable. Jumping into SBL all at once can be overwhelming for both the teacher and the student. SBL feels very new and may be uncomfortable, so it's important to introduce new ideas slowly. Ultimately, the student is at the center of all instruction, practice, and assessment: always do what's best for your students, and you can't go wrong. 


-         Find the “I Can” version of your course standards. Know them forward and backward. These should be your starting point for all instruction/activity/PBLs, and your endpoint for all assessment. There should be no instruction or work in your classroom that does not directly relate to the standards for your subject.

-          Give your students their own personal copy of the “I Can” standards. Read them together (or at least read the standards you will focus on for a particular unit/grading period). Make sure students understand them.
 
-          Have students self-assess on the standards you will address before you begin them in lessons. Have students self-assess at some point during the instructional unit, and again at the end of the instructional unit. This promotes understanding of the standard/expectation as well as student agency.

-          Use an objective, 60-100 grading scale with clear delineations for each level on the scale. Provide action steps for each level on the scale (e.g., 100% - I need to look at the next standard and move on; 90% - I need to re-read the standard to see what I’m missing and make an extra push; 80% - I’m struggling with this standard and I need to ask for help; 70% - I made an effort but I don’t get this standard at all and I need to arrange for one-on-one time with my teacher; 60% - I didn’t turn anything in to show I can do this standard, and I need to get my work in now!).

-          Set up a means of consistent communication with families that will hold you accountable (e.g., weekly parent newsletter through LiveGrades or email, paper newsletter sent home with students, commitment to individual contact every week, video update, whatever works for you and your students’ families).

-          Assessment MUST reflect students’ ability to perform the standards you’ve addressed. This means severely limiting or totally eliminating grades for homework and participation (these are behaviors, not proficiency. In a positive classroom focused on proficiency and students’ needs, negative behaviors will stop!).

-          Give students consistent, timely, written feedback with action steps for moving forward (e.g., “You’ve included the first three parts of the standard, but you didn’t show part four. Please add this information and turn in your work again for re-evaluation before next Thursday” is much more helpful than “Good!”).

-          Flexible, student-made deadlines. Tell students what you need them to do to demonstrate that they can perform the standard, then ask when they think they can have it done. If they set the deadline, they’re more likely to meet it.  If a student needs an extra day or two, let them have it. If a student is done early and wants to turn their work in early, let them do it, then direct them to the next step (don’t hold a strong student back from more learning!). Be reasonable, fair, and responsive to students’ needs.

-          Allow and encourage students to re-evaluate their skills any time until grades are due, as many times as they want, and replace their old score with their new one.  Remind students that they should read the feedback you’ve provided for them as well as the standard before they attempt to re-evaluate; this will save you a lot of time and it will help keep students focused on the standard being assessed. Grades are meant to be an indicator of what students can do right now, not what they did two months ago. Why hold an old grade against a student who has made progress? If they worked to improve their performance on a standard, their grade should reflect that growth.

-          Growth – a student may begin the grading period with a D and end it with an A. This should be expected, as students are here to learn and grow. A growth mindset allows students to move forward after doing poorly, because they know that mistakes are necessary for learning.


-          Emphasize process over product. If we put all of our effort into the process of learning/making/doing, students’ final products will naturally be better.  If we focus on the product, students never learn what it takes to learn/make/do things better. 

sábado, 28 de abril de 2012

Collaboration!

Hola a todos,

I've been thinking about how we do activities in the Spanish classroom, and today (Friday, 4/27) seemed like the perfect day to think about it. Fifth and sixth grade are working on their Se Busca (Wanted) posters, and 7th grade are working on their preposition posters. Neither project is groupwork, but I want students to collaborate as they work on their individual assignments.

One thing I like a lot right now is how student desks are set up. We have six groups of four desks each, turned to make tables. With a configuration like that, students are forced to look at each other and I think they get into the habit of sharing ideas and information (mis estudiantes, am I right about that?). Even when they're working on individual assignments, they seem to be comfortable sharing books, handouts, supplies, and pointers for how to do things. I find that I'm repeating myself less because someone in the group has heard me and repeats what I've said for the other group members. So far, the groups seem to be keeping a pretty positive dynamic.

So the younger students are working on Se Busca posters. They make up an imaginary person (or flesh-eating animal, or space alien with tacos for hands, or whatever), they draw and color it, and then they write a detailed description of their character in Spanish that they will share with the class. It's a fun, visual way to get students to do a writing sample (most of them don't even consider it a writing assignment), and I'm always thrilled with students' imaginative ideas. This nine weeks, I've seen a number of mustachioed unicorns, two drawings that incorporate monocles, a one-eyed green farmer, a rainbow-haired ballerina, and a "man-eating flying squirrel with vampire teeth that sparkle" (Rico's words, not mine). Yes, to answer your question, my students know how to say unicorn, mustache, monocle, cyclops farmer, rainbows, flying squirrel, and sparkly in Spanish. And I didn't have to look up a single word. That's the scary part.

The cool thing about the Se Busca posters is that most kids really own the project. They take an idea and they run with it for two or three days. This group in particular, though, has been very group-oriented. When I walk through the room, I hear things like "I know where to find that word--look at your adjectives handout on the left-hand side," "I think you need a different verb," or "Wow that looks really cool, will you show me how to do that?" I love how they collaborate on the simplest tasks, making language learning easier for everyone. I'm not sure how we got to this stage of collaboration, but I have to figure out how to make it happen with every class! Fifth and sixth graders, if you're reading, you guys are awesome. Keep up the good work!

Seventh grade is working on preposition posters. The textbook we use pushes us through eight rather mundane prepositions as soon as we learn the verb estar ("to be," used for changing conditions such as location). As soon as the book presents the prepositions (under, on top of, beside, inside of, in front of, behind, close to, far from), it expects students to know all eight and it immediately moves on to other topics. Memorizing eight prepositions is an exercise in futility. They're very similar-sounding and memorization is boring to begin with. To make things a touch easier, I have students create a poster illustrating all eight prepositions using two objects of their choice. Students pick interesting object pairs, like a worm and an apple, a rock and a snail, a spider and a web, a brick and a spider, a penguin and a cookie, a dragon and a turtle. The girl who chose a rock and a snail drew a power drill in one of her illustrations. "It's for the snail to get inside the rock," she said. Brilliant.

The cool thing about the 7th grade class is that they're starting to feel like a team. They had a rough start to the semester, but from what I saw yesterday and today, they're learning to trust and rely on each other. That kind of trust and reliance is crucial in a language class--you learn language in order to communicate with others; you can't just sit around talking to yourself! We were able to joke around a little in class today and still reach our goal for the period. That felt great because sometimes I feel like I can't afford to joke around with them, or things will get out of hand and we won't get our goals done for the day. I can't wait for Monday, when they'll give their poster presentations and share their work with each other. That's my favorite part of this assignment, watching them talk about what they've done and laugh with each other.

I like walking through the class, seeing what students have chosen to work on, watching their decisions in action and listening to the learning conversations that happen. Certainly, silly things go on. When you put 20 13-year-olds together, silly things are destined to occur. My classroom is noisy. Between the student chatter and the Spanish-language music that I subject them to, my door is often shut in an effort to spare the rest of the school the insanity. When I see the kinds of ideas that students develop as they work together, I wonder why lecture and teacher-led instruction is the traditional method of education. I could never in a million years come up with the questions that my students ask--who am I to lecture them when I can't even predict the questions that they want answered? I like to give them the information they need to create something and then watch them create it.

Sometimes I think I might be having more fun than my students. Where else in the whole world could I speak Spanish all day long, guide students through the creative/language learning process, and then celebrate their achievements with them? The best part of my day is sitting at a table with students who are working hard at something and just talking to them about their work. They have so much to share, and they want to do and say everything in Spanish! They make my job easy.

viernes, 27 de abril de 2012

Traveling with students

Several times in my very brief teaching career, I have had the opportunity to chaperon student trips. It might be a simple walk to the high school for 9th grade orientation, a day trip to the city to see a play and have lunch, or a weekend in D.C. with 120 eighth-graders, and one time, it was a week in Costa Rica. I always take that opportunity. Always.

If you're a teacher, you know that kids act completely differently in the classroom than they do outside of school. This phenomenon can be difficult for others to understand ("Yes ma'am, your son did say that word in my class. Yes ma'am, I understand he would never do that at home. I guess I just bring out the best in him."). If you're a student, you might not even notice that you act differently at school than you do at home. I love my students, and I love watching them grow and learn in my classroom. I also really love to take them out of the classroom and watch them experience the world first-hand.

This past weekend, I traveled with 80 eighth grade students and six other teachers to Washington, D.C. It's roughly six hours from our school, so we take charter buses and go for the weekend. This is the third year that I've gone with students on this trip, and I have to tell you about the kids. They were fabulous. They were perfect travelers: they paid attention to their surroundings, they were on time (even early!) to everything, they were observant, respectful, positive, they asked questions, they tried new things, and they made me proud.

The highlight of the trip for me was seeing D.C. through my students' eyes. Our first stop was the Okinawa monument, which has a clear view of the Washington monument. One boy came up to me, pointed at the Washington monument, pointed to the Okinawa monument, and just stood there for a minute. I couldn't figure out what he was doing until his friend said, "He's speechless because we're seeing stuff we've only seen in pictures, and now it's real." And that reaction was exactly what I had hoped for.

We took the kids to a ton of museums and they walked around in small groups. I loved walking through those museums and running into groups of students huddled around a display, reading the information card out loud and saying, "Cool!" or "I saw that in our science book," or "I never knew that!" When I suggested an exhibit, they actually went to it, and we talked about it afterwards on the bus. It made me giddy to hear "Yeah, that human bones exhibit was creepy, but really cool. Thanks for telling us about it," and "I saw that photography display you told me about. Those pictures were amazing!" More importantly, I heard a lot of those same conversations happening among students as they compared what they'd seen. Books are great and the internet is full of information, but there's nothing like seeing the world first-hand and discussing it with the people around you.

Once some of the newness wore off, students learned new and different lessons. Some students were waiting at a checkpoint for the rest of the group, and a stranger started talking to them. They didn't know how to react--they know better than to talk to strangers, but they had to meet with the rest of the group in that place in just a few minutes. It's important to note that where we come from, it's incredibly rude to ignore someone, so that option might not have crossed their minds. We learned, though, that it's okay to ignore strangers, that we should never share personal information with other people we don't know, and the best approach is to look for a teacher or adult we know so we're not stuck in an uncomfortable situation. The kids handled it really well.

Another lesson we learned (and one I suspect our students already knew) is that a sense of humor and a positive attitude will turn any trip into an amazing experience. Pablo fell on a stone bench while diving for a frisbee and got a nasty bruise. As soon as he realized he was okay, though, he started laughing. He was in pain for the next couple of days, but he still smiled about his awesome dive and he never once complained about how much his leg hurt. What could have been a serious accident was just a bump in the road (sorry, Pablo!). In general, everyone was upbeat and happy all the time. I heard several kids say, "This is the best trip ever!"

We also learned to take care of the people around us. Every adult on the trip had a group of 10 students, and we checked in with each other to make sure everyone was accounted for. My group of ten fabulous students became the duckies ("patitos" en español!), and I'm a little embarrassed to say that they were more responsible than I was! When the trip leader announced that students had to find their adult, my duckies immediately found each other, counted to be sure that everyone was there, and then waited for me. They watched out for each other, and when one came up missing, we found him immediately because there were ten of us looking instead of just one of us. And when I was tardy to the party, they waited for me while the other groups moved on. I also thought it was hilarious when they quacked to get my attention. ¡Gracias, patitos!

We learned to enjoy each others' company, too. While seeing the White House and the Washington Monument was great, we had a lot of down time, and we were never ever bored. Six hours on the bus flew by because of great conversation and some really, incredibly funny students. I laughed so hard my face hurt for two days. Adults, when was the last time you had a long, meaningful, funny conversation with a 14 year old? And 14 year olds, when was the last time you had a long, meaningful, funny conversation with an adult? If you learn to enjoy the people around you, it won't matter where you are--you'll always have a good time.

Conclusion: 8th graders are genuinely funny and interesting people. Seriously. I'm so very proud of the students on the trip, and I'm proud to say I work with some of the funniest, most interesting, and most thoughtful people I've ever met. Thank you, 8th graders, for being who you are.